Artificial Hardwood Replacement for Dry Docking Blocks

Navy SBIR 25.4-Release 11 - Conventional Topic N254-122
Naval Facilities Engineering Center (NAVFAC)
Pre-release 8/6/25   Opens to accept proposals 8/27/25   Closes 9/24/25 12:00pm ET    [ View Q&A ] - [View Topic Webinar]

N254-122 TITLE: Artificial Hardwood Replacement for Dry Docking Blocks

OUSD (R&E) CRITICAL TECHNOLOGY AREA(S): Advanced Materials

OBJECTIVE: Develop a hardwood replacement compound for the blocks being used in dry docking ships. This loading is perpendicular to the wood grain and in compression only. Wood is used for its compliance under these forces. The replacement compound product does not need to look like wood or have a grain.

DESCRIPTION: Stakeholder Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility needs a replacement for the hardwood caps on the docking blocks to continue the mission of repairing submarines and ships at their facility.

U.S. Navy docking blocks have changed very little in the past 100 years. These concrete blocks have a footprint of 42" x 48", and a total height of 48". The top and bottom of the concrete block are capped with 3ea 48" x 6" x 14" white oak timbers. See UFC 4-213-10, Figure 8-2 for the standard drawing [Ref 1]. These timbers are increasingly difficult to procure with long lead times. Additionally, these timbers are vulnerable to both termite and fungal attacks.

Larger dimension blocks, such as 12" x 12" x 48" are also in great need with a desire to use woodworking tools to cut the blocks into shape to conform to the shape of a ship’s hull.

This loading is perpendicular to the wood grain and in compression only. Wood is used for its compliance under these forces. The desired product does not need to look like wood or have a grain.

Capability Requirements/Performance Goals

A replacement compound for the hardwood caps would:

• Have the same or greater compressive strength when compared to white oak

• Have similar stress-strain characteristics to white oak

• Be nailable with similar or greater pullout strength to white oak

• Be able to withstand at least 330 LT for up to five years while remaining dimensionally stable

• Be immune to fungal and insect attack

• Be submersible without degradation

• Have the same or greater friction with concrete and steel without damaging the surface

• Be shapeable with woodworking tools

• Be nontoxic with nontoxic byproducts from cutting and forming

• Be price competitive to white oak

• Be produced in lead times under 30 days for up to 20k board-feet

In Japan, ESLON Neo Lumber FFU, a fiber reinforced foamed urethane product, has been used in this role, but this product is not available in the U.S. market and is cost prohibitive.

PHASE I: Identify potential materials and manufacturing processes that can be used to create materials that will meet the capability requirements and performance goals listed in the Description above. Conduct mechanical and chemical feasibility testing on samples. Develop a Phase II plan.

PHASE II: Based on Phase I results, further refine the material samples to meet the performance goals. Fabricate and validate the selected prototype series and mount the sample caps to a docking block for testing in a dry dock. Prepare documentation required for prototype testing and deliver prototypes to shipyard for demonstration and validation. The Navy will identify up to 6 blocks where the caps are ready to be replaced. These blocks will likely be located in dry docks in San Diego and/or Hawaii.

PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS: Upon demonstrating and validating the prototype cap samples for docking blocks in Phase II, the awardee will need to further prove the capability to create custom shapes and sizes beyond caps (i.e. side blocks) which have the same requirement and performance goals. Firm will scale up to provide 5,000 board-feet within a 30-day lead time with a plan to scale up to 20,000 board-feet within a 30-day lead time. Support the transition to use in Navy shipyards. Material with these properties would be useful in a number of industries. This would be an excellent substitute for hardwood used in marine fenders and railroad ties. As an idea of the amount of hardwood used, a typical destroyer dry dock block build uses 19,000 board-feet of hardwood. Current spending on hardwood caps at Pearl Harbor is about $750k per year. The DON’s spending on hardwood is likely similar at all four major shipyards: Norfolk Naval Shipyard (NNSY), Portsmouth Naval Shipyard (PNSY), Puget Sound Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility (PSNS&IMF), and Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility (PHNSY&IMF).

REFERENCES:

  1. "UFC 4-213-10 UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) GRAVING DRY DOCKS." 18 May 2020. https://www.wbdg.org/FFC/DOD/UFC/ufc_4_213_10_2020.pdf
  2. American Hardwood Export Council. "STRUCTURAL DESIGN IN AMERICAN HARDWOODS." 2005. https://www.americanhardwood.org/sites/default/files/publications/download/2017-04/AHEC%20Structural%20Guide.pdf
  3. Western Wood Products Association. "PRODUCT USE MANUAL." June 2008. https://www.wwpa.org/resources/?id=western-lumber-product-use-manual

KEYWORDS: Material science; Artificial Hardwood; Dry docks; Wood Replacement; Lumber; Timber; Timber Replacement


** TOPIC NOTICE **

The Navy Topic above is an "unofficial" copy from the Navy Topics in the DoD 25.4 Release 11 SBIR BAA. Please see the official DoD Topic website at www.dodsbirsttr.mil/submissions/solicitation-documents/active-solicitations for any updates.

The DoD issued its Navy 25.4 Release 11 SBIR Topics pre-release on August 6, 2025 which opens to receive proposals on August 27, 2025, and closes September 27, 2025 (12:00pm ET).

Direct Contact with Topic Authors: During the pre-release period (August 6, 2025, through August 26, 2025) proposing firms have an opportunity to directly contact the Technical Point of Contact (TPOC) to ask technical questions about the specific BAA topic. The TPOC contact information is listed in each topic description. Once DoD begins accepting proposals on August 27, 2025 no further direct contact between proposers and topic authors is allowed unless the Topic Author is responding to a question submitted during the Pre-release period.

DoD On-line Q&A System: After the pre-release period, until September 10, 2025, at 12:00 PM ET, proposers may submit written questions through the DoD On-line Topic Q&A at https://www.dodsbirsttr.mil/submissions/login/ by logging in and following instructions. In the Topic Q&A system, the questioner and respondent remain anonymous but all questions and answers are posted for general viewing.

DoD Topics Search Tool: Visit the DoD Topic Search Tool at www.dodsbirsttr.mil/topics-app/ to find topics by keyword across all DoD Components participating in this BAA.

Help: If you have general questions about the DoD SBIR program, please contact the DoD SBIR Help Desk via email at DoDSBIRSupport@reisystems.com

Topic Q & A

9/8/25  Q.
  1. What kind of tools are considered standard woodworking tools? And what kind of blade tips?
  2. How long are caps submersed in water?
  3. How long is a valid creep test? Do you have any compression creep strain data for white oak?
  4. What is the coefficient of friction of white oak in respect to concrete?
  5. What kind of tests are used for fungus/mold?
   A.
  1. We are using band saws and circular saws for shaping. We use power planers as part of regular maintenance of the blocks throughout the life of the block. For drilling we use spade bits, auger bits, and standard twist bits depending on the hole.
  2. Up to a week in as much as 40 feet of salt water
  3. We do not yet have solid data on white oak creep. Use appropriate ASTM.
  4. We do not have solid data on this at this time, we have a study planned for this year.
  5. Use appropriate ASTM
8/26/25  Q.
  • Is there flexibility in block thickness, or must the replacement material match the standard 6" profile? Can we go down to 4" or 3"?
  • Is white oak reused across multiple vessel dockings, or is it typically single-use?
  • Can the shape of white oak blocks be modified repeatedly to accommodate different hull geometries?
  • What is the current cost per board foot for white oak used in dry dock applications?
  • May offerors propose a multi-material solution, such as a structural core with machinable surface layers?
  •    A.
    • 6” profile is a hard requirement because the blocks are also used as a nailing surface for the required build up on top of the blocks.
    • The oak blocks are reused multiple times.
    • Generally no, the cut blocks are usually used for one ship class only.
    • The current cost for one cap one block (three ea 6” x 14” x48”) is around $500
    • Yes, multi material solution are potentially acceptable.


    [ Return ]